A. Sasnovich
To Win
E. Arango
To Win
Heather Watson vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Watson 1 - 1 Sasnovich
They have played 5 sets in total, with Watson winning 2 and Sasnovich winning 3. The last match between Watson and Sasnovich was at the U.S. Open - New York, 21-08-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Aliaksandra Sasnovich getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heather Watson | 1 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 1 |
U.S. Open - New York(21-08-2024)
6
1
6
4
| Watson | Stats | Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (6-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 192 | Ranking | 110 |
| 38 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 32 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 11 |
| 55% (428-355) | Career Total W/L | 59% (434-302) |
| $2,680,534 | Career Prize Money | $3,925,398 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Heather Watson
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 20 | Games Won | 21 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:46:0 | Average Match Time | 1:46:0 |
| 49% (66/134) | 1st Serve % | 70% (104/149) |
| 65% (43/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (58/104) |
| 29% (20/68) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 33% (11/33) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
| 50% (74/149) | Return Points Win % | 53% (71/134) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Heather Watson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Heather Watson
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Xinxin Yao
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Zarina Diyas
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Heather Watson
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Heather Watson
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Marina Stakusic
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Heather Watson
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Heather Watson
87%
(
60 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Erika Andreeva
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Georgia Pedone
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
21%
(
6 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (428/355) | Win/Loss | 59% (434/302) |
| 54% (977/848) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (984/745) |
| 52% (8890/8202) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8336/7571) |
| 54% (225/192) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (173/130) |
| 50% (58/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (125/94) |
| 64% (84/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (113/54) |
| 52% (61/57) | Grass Win/Loss | 49% (23/24) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2362 | Aces Total | 1232 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2243 | Total Double Faults | 2421 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:1 |
| 411.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.71 |
| 60% (29436/49150) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24373/38307) |
| 65% (19187/29436) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (15111/24373) |
| 45% (8855/19703) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (6098/13934) |
| 45% (2626/5786) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2243/4821) |
| 44% (21609/48928) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17338/38420) |
| 44% (46/58) | Slam W/L | 52% (47/43) |
| 45% (58/70) | Masters W/L | 50% (62/61) |
| 66% (23/12) | Cups W/L | 57% (17/13) |
| 52% (159/148) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (161/120) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (134/66) | Challenger W/L | 65% (97/53) |
| 89% (8/1) | Futures W/L | 81% (50/12) |
| 55% (423/775) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (432/733) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (103/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (98/177) |
| 53% (140/265) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (141/259) |
| 85% (410/350) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (416/356) |
| 14% (410/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (416/60) |
| 21% (373/77) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (319/77) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
